Instead of red flag laws, why won’t lawmakers investigate psychiatric drugs and their links to violence?

second amendment

As we’ve come to expect, “RINOs” (Republicans in name only) like Senator Lindsey Graham of South Carolina are now eagerly pushing the so-called “red flag” laws that Ivanka Trump and Jared Kushner want to see implemented all across the country as an affront to the Second Amendment. But why is nothing being said about the role that psychiatric pharmaceuticals like SSRIs (selective serotonin reputake inhibitors) quite obviously play in America’s mass shootings?

As we’ve reported time and time again, the one thing that (almost) every alleged mass shooting has in common is that the supposed shooters had all been taking mind-altering pharmaceuticals in the lead up to their killing sprees. And yet, we never hear Congress calling for common-sense pharma pill control.

No matter what conservatives try to do in an attempt to assuage the gun-grabbing left, the fact of the matter is that the left will always hate conservatives. So why not stop pandering to them, and instead address the obvious elephant in the room, known as Big Pharma.

“The overwhelming evidence points to the single largest common factor in all of these incidents is the fact that all of the perpetrators were either actively taking powerful psychotropic drugs or had been at some point in the immediate past before they committed their crimes,” writes Dan Roberts for

“Multiple credible scientific studies going back more than a decade, as well as internal documents from certain pharmaceutical companies that suppressed the information show that SSRI drugs … have well known, but unreported side effects, including but not limited to suicide and other violent behavior.”

Guns don’t kill people; PEOPLE kill people – and usually people who kill people are taking legal Big Pharma drugs

Besides the fact that, in and of themselves, pharma drugs kill far more people every single day than gun violence, the impact of this pharmakeia sorcery on users’ brains is causing many of them to turn certifiably crazy. And every so often, some of these pharma-induced “dead heads” decide to go on a shooting spree, to which the brainwashed left always and unilaterally responds with calls for the abolishment of the Second Amendment – even though the actual culprits are these pharma pills, which are sold by legal drug dealers at the millions of CVS, Walgreens, and Rite-Aid “dispensaries” that dot the American landscape.

It’s a horrific epidemic that never gets addressed by the mainstream media. Only on sites like Natural News, which are now banned from most social media and tech platforms, will you ever hear about the link between pharma drugs and mass shootings, as all of the “verified” and “approved” media outlets continue to blame guns.

Sadly, many Americans would seem to already be too drugged out themselves to recognize the truth. Between their pharmaceutical stockpiles; fluoride in the drinking water supply; and chemicals in the food supply, a large segment of the country is now so brain-damaged that they actually think guns are the problem – which certainly bodes ominous for the future of our once-great republic.

“Those focusing on further firearms bans or magazine restrictions are clearly focusing on the wrong issue and asking the wrong questions, either as a deliberate attempt to hide these links, or out of complete and utter ignorance,” Roberts contends.

“Don’t let them! Force our elected ‘representatives’ and the media to cast a harsh spotlight on this issue. Don’t stop hounding them until they do.”

To learn more about the Second Amendment and why it must always be non-negotiable, regardless of what the “news” claims is happening in the world, be sure to check out

Sources for this article include:


  1. Gun violence? How ’bout Prozac violence…Way too much credence is given to gun control as a solution. The bigger problem is the vast amount of children labeled with some type of disorder and then given powerful psychotropic drugs (SSRI’s) to combat those disorders. Finding a different solution to drugging our children for an attention disorder ought to be top on the list. Most, if not all, of the mass shooters have been on doctor prescribed meds of one type or another. The school system is way too quick to put unruly kids on drugs rather than try other methods like changes in diet or god forbid…discipline. The first question they should be asking (but never do) is what prescribed meds is he on.

    In the United States, there are one million children under the age of
    six on psychiatric drugs. This number is particularly disturbing,
    considering the horrifying side effects and ineffectiveness of a good
    number of these types of harmful drugs.

    One in six Americans overall regularly take some type of medication
    in this category. However, children are now being swept up in Big
    Pharma’s desire to make money, not improve health. Mental health
    watchdog group Citizens Commission on Human Rights is
    drawing attention to the concerning fact that more than a million kids
    younger than six in our nation are currently taking these psychiatric

    According to Natural News, around half of these children are four to five years old and an incredible 274,804 of them are younger than a year old. That’s right: babies are being given psychiatric drugs. The number rises for toddlers aged two to three, with 370,778 kids in this category taking psychiatric drugs overall. If this isn’t horrifying to you, congratulations on your brainwashing.

    Data from IMS Health shows that the drug situation only gets worse as kids get older, with 4,130,340 kids aged 6 to 12 taking some type of psychiatric drug.

    You might be forgiven for assuming that most of these
    statistics are made up by kids taking ADHD drugs given how common that
    approach seems to be nowadays, but it really only accounts for a small
    portion of it, with 1,422 of those younger than a year old and just over
    181,000 of those aged four to five taking ADHD drugs. –Natural News

  2. Because there’s no money, per se, in ‘guns’, and there’s YUUUUUUUUUUGE money in Big Pharma – and EVERYONE benefits.

    That’s why

    Besides. Unarmed, then they DO have total control.

    Why do you think they went after NZ so hard after that staged event?

    BECAUSE MANY OF THE ELITES HAVE ‘SAFE SPACES’ THERE IF IT ALL TURNS TO SHIT. They didn’t want an armed populace looking for them, and NZ was a nice little controllable island.

Comments are closed.